0·
4 months agoThat took 4 days
And that was with him chilling conspicuously out in public and making no attempts to lay low, after making no attempt to hide his face during the incident.
JWBananas
aka @[email protected] aka @[email protected] aka @[email protected]
- 0 Posts
- 140 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 14th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
0·4 months agoElian Gonzalas
At one point Fox canceled like 20 other shows, with Greg the Bunny being one of them, between the time Fox cancelled Family Guy, and the time they brought back Family guy.
They didn’t. They had access to workstations which were then compromised in turn.
They were breached via a compromised security vendor
If Jesus Christ of the New Testament existed, no one in the “Christian” right would be welcome in his house.
Would all not be welcome? Isn’t that supposed to be your point about their condescending gatekeeping?
The awards are more heavily influenced by album sales than subjective judgements of musical quality.
Do you know who Jon Batiste is?
The album won on quality. The sales spiked after the win.
every old Nissan I see falls apart
That says a lot more about the owners than it does about the vehicles.
It is little more than a distraction. The big news this week was that Musk nearly got the government shut down so that he could have a provision harmful to his foreign business removed from the bill. As a result, “President Musk” is trending, and Trump doesn’t like that.
Lest we forget:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/16/media/steve-bannon-reliable-sources/index.html
“The Democrats don’t matter,” Bannon told Lewis. “The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit.”
That’s the Bannon business model: Flood the zone. Stink up the joint. As Jonathan Rauch once said, citing Bannon’s infamous quote, “This is not about persuasion: This is about disorientation.”
Don’t fall for the bait.
It was already made illegal (as of mid 2010) without affirmative opt-in by the consumer.
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1005/17/
Anyone who paid overdraft fees beyond August 15, 2010 affirmatively chose to do so.
Men do what too, come across as “plastic and fake”?
And that sinks their elections? Not coming across as genuine?
We’re talking about Harris vs Trump, right?
Can you say with a straight face that you have ever believed anything you have ever heard out of Trump’s mouth came across as genuine? Not just opportunistic? Not just tailored to his audience?
The man who literally slathers himself in excessive amounts of bronzer doesn’t come across as plastic?
The arguments about successful female politicians coming across as insincere are tiring. Respectfully, I think you might have missed the point of me linking to that specific video. It is all about the unfair expectations projected onto women, to be one way, but to not too much that way, but also be the opposite way too. It is all about being forced to conform to societal expectations while also being expected to come across with sincerity. It is literally impossible.
Watching both women, I told my wife (a big Clinton and Harris supporter), that they both come across as plastic and fake. Their smiles don’t quite reach their eyes. They’re trying to ACT authentic, not genuinely BE authentic.
Clinton almost comes across as psychopathic in this regard and while Harris isn’t quite so bad, the reaction in her camp to her fakeness didn’t help, especially when it came to things like her fake laugh and the coconut tree comment.
When I hear comments like these, only one thing comes to mind:
0·5 months agoI predict all but one of the quantum fissures were the result of bearded Boimler trying to get his PADD back.
It’s Viacom all the way down
And without the context that the Ars article provides, that information means very little to the casual visitor. There is absolutely nothing on that website to provide any of that context. It certainly doesn’t say that by uploading your photo, you are agreeing to allow Google an irrevocable licence to use it to train AI.
The only thing there is an image that says “Take control” which just links to the author’s cloud storage company. This whole thing is thinly-veiled viral marketing.
Sure, but that still feels very “You agreed!”. The only place on that website that tells you “beforehand” is hidden in the terms of service. That’s literally no different.
The site (TheySeeYourPhotos) returns what Google Vision is able to decern from photos. You can test with any image you want or there are some sample images available.
…by submitting them to Google, who then keeps a copy of them and uses them for the exact same purpose which purportedly compelled the author to leave Google.
Hopefully things go better than with Bajor.