• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    356 months ago

    Ofwat should only allow this on the provision that executives bonuses are removed, shareholders don’t receive any dividends for the next decade and the current heads of the water companies have to be dragged through a river every week.

    • GreatAlbatrossM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      226 months ago

      I’ve previously advocated for the the first 1000L of any sewage runoff to be directed through executive’s houses.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Now that is a nice idea, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that just forces them into their holiday homes abroad.

        Isn’t there a church somewhere that still has a ducking stool? I’ve had an idea. Wonder if they’ll rent it out.

        • GreatAlbatrossM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          116 months ago

          If they leave the country, we can assign a man with a portable bucket of sewage.
          We will have no issues finding such a man: Most of Thames Water’s customers would pay for the privilege.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            96 months ago

            As one of those people, I’m very happy to volunteer. Or maybe we make it compulsory like jury duty.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 months ago

              I currently live in Scotland, but I could do with a vacation to follow a rich cunt round with a bucket of sewage

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      problem is then that shareholders will pull their money and invest elsewhere leaving the taxpayer to pick up the pieces. clever privatisations always leave the public purse to bail out any losses 😒

      the solution: don’t privatise in the first place. it’s like selling all your shit at a pawn shop