• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1591 year ago

    Mike Johnson said “I personally have real reservations about doing this [expulsion], I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.” Yes, let’s NOT set a precedent of holding politicians accountable for lies, fraud, and theft!

    It should be pretty easy to find the list of everyone else who voted not to expel, so we know who is pro-corruption.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      I mean, yeah…They’re all criminals. Would be pretty stupid of them to want this to be normal. Because of all the crime, ya know?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        Congress did an internal investigation and determined he likely broke the law. There you go.

        This is just like any other workplace.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 year ago

          The bar for losing your job as a congress person or any public servant for corruption should be way lower than the bar for being sent to prison.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He said this well after the Ethics Committee released its findings. Santos was effectively shown to be guilty.

        In the previous attempts at expulsion, a lot of people voted against simply because the report wasn’t out yet. It would have set a dangerous precedent to vote to expel someone without proof of wrongdoing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        He literally was just convicted in a trial by his peers. His explosion is exactly the basis for common law including many of the points of the magna carta.

        • rigatti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Explosion? This whole event was way cooler than I initially thought.