🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

  • azalty@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just open their privacy policy and done. They sell your browsing info, and you could stop it there

      • themakara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Have you ever heard his full stance on the matter? Because he clearly stated that this is not a judgment against using it. Heck, he’s been open about having sailed the high seas himself and still doing so for media he physically owns.

        It’s just that gaining access to media while circumventing the payment (ads in this case) is basically piracy. Which is fair.

        Signed, A uBlock User

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I trust Linus is being sincere when he says “it’s not a judgement” but blocking ads is being compared to a criminal doing copyright infringement (illegal). The word used is one originally meaning for a person murdering others on boats (immoral), and it’s used because it’s pejorative. It’s unavoidably judgemental.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How much you want to bet he uses Ad block himself but it’s suddenly different when YOU do it on HIS content?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It…is? You’re copying digital content without paying for it. I use uBlock but I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is. Taking from a service without paying for it, and actively avoiding the service making money via advertising is basically the same as watching a film without paying for it.

        Both ways, you consumed a service and the people providing it got nothing, but it cost them something to create and provide it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    LTT… toilet flushing! I had no expectations of paypal. To my shame I used them in the past,but deleted my account after reading how scummy they are. fuck paypal and anything affiliated with them.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They’re one of the largest tech media companies and deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it. Then they took sponsorships from Karma, which is a competitor to Honey that does the exact same thing.

      • Jin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, they are not one of largest tech media companies They have less than what 100 employees. Maybe you used the wrong term?

        When did they learn about it? Where your proof?

        • It’s the holidays and a lot of content of made awhile, I don’t expect them to make dedicated statement.
          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I watched it, but I’ll reserve my judgment until the next wan show because I don’t know if it has been mentioned before on an earlier show or how the problem has been interpret by staff.

            • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              … Ok well here’s the link to the moment (in the video you watched) where we have one **staff ** member giving an official response to how LTT interpreted the problem in a forum post on their website.

              https://youtu.be/vc4yL3YTwWk?t=811

              And here’s a link to their youtube channel where they talk about honey

              https://www.youtube.com/@LinusTechTips/search?query=honey

              You’ll notice. There isn’t one.

              So for at least two years, they knew honey was stealing affiliate links and considered it a big enough problem to end their partnership, but did not consider it a big enough issue to make a video on it.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I dunno why you keep sending me a bunch of text and videos. I’m going to wait until the next wan show, so I can understand what really happened inside.

                • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’m down to listen to their response myself but as someone who tried really hard to explain away their last dumb controversy only to be proven wrong multiple times, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just pure negligence. Actions speak louder than words and their actions have shown they’re a flawed company like any other despite what their conversations on WAN show would have you believe.

                  Fuck Honey/PayPal first and foremost, don’t get me wrong. But unless there were legal issues around it, we also can’t ignore it if the biggest tech YouTube channel found out about one of the biggest sponsors on YouTube being a scam, stopped working with them for that reason, but said absolutely nothing to anyone else.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          First of all, Lemmy has a lot of users for whom English is a second language. So maybe don’t be a jackass about correcting grammar.

          Secondly, in case you happen to be in that group of people ‘largest media company’ in this context applies to their reach, and not to their actual size. They are ‘large’ because they have a large audience, generate a lot of revenue, and are worth a lot of money. LMG also comprises 10 different YouTube channels with maybe 10 billion views between them.

          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Look I’m not correcting grammar, I’m not native English speaker myself + I’m very dyslexic.

            But when someone says the biggest tech media companies, you put them in same category as Disney, Apple and so on, which makes them very small.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sometimes people exaggerate and if you point out what they said is inaccurate then they get mad you’re not addressing their main point.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                People are going mad anyways, doesn’t really matter especially here on lemmy ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

                People are putting the blame on creators, instead of PayPal/honey, when creators are the victims too. We don’t know the full story from LLT from their side if “deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it

                If I’m questioning it, I’m going to get negative feedback because the narrative is they are to blame because they are “big”.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t really wanna watch a video… but how do you “steal” affiliate links or coupon codes?

    If you are doing affiliate marketing for a company and they give you a coupon code for 10% off called GET10OFF and that code gets used, the affiliate marketer gets the sale no matter where they got that code from?

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve slept since I watched and am not great with tech, but iirc the link with the affiliate code when clicked takes you to the site. Then honey has a pop up that, when clicked, replaces the link with their own, swiping the commission. Hope that makes sense - most people likely would not catch it. The Linus tech tips was used as an example of even a tech channel with lots of employees taking quite a while to notice themselves, and even when they did, it wasn’t quite conclusive for some reason?

      Another thing the video touched on is that honey would claim to search for coupons but often opt to show what the partnered companies want. So, could be there’s a coupon for 50% but they only show 10%.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Ah gotcha. So what I said about coupon codes would be valid, but affiliate links are different than the coupon codes. Also crazy they hide bigger discounts.

        Edit: But I guess they could find a company offering a coupon code, then sign up themselves knowing it’s an option now, and then show that code instead.

    • Googlyman64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      He says that when you click on an affiliate link, a cookie gets stored on your browser that lasts for 30 days, saying that the source should get the commission for your purchase. Honey has a popup in checkout, even when there are no codes, with a big “Got It” button to close the popup. Clicking the Got It button replaces the old cookie with a Honey cookie, giving the commission from your purchase to them instead of your source.

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I used honey for a while and it was working great for me with “exclusive” coupons and Cashback and then one time I bough a cellphone that was supposed to have $250 cashback. I did all the necessary steps, read the t&c, took screenshots of the offer and made the purchase. I never got the transaction to appear on their website. Sending emails it trying to contact them was futile (I even made an automatic script to send an email everyday to follow up). Fuck PayPal

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    At this point, anything these goons “influencers” try to sell me on is a scam, and I’ll avoid it at all costs. People do insane things for money. Just watched a coffeezilla video on the CSGO gambling scam and holy shit, people are straight up heartless and have no humanity in them.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Everybody: Fuck Peter Thiel, fuck Elon Musk, fuck Honey, Fuck PayPal

    Everybody: unflinchingly using PayPal

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Deleted my ebay account but very rarely will buy on it. I’ve yet to find a UK alternative.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dunno, I stopped a while back, it wasn’t hard really. I’ve also heard that while they are usually fine with regular sums of money they are not to be trusted with large sums. Just word of mouth an I’ve got no proof but it put me off.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are some examples of buyers exploiting the returns policy for expensive items. The buyer initiates a return of item but never sends it, gets item and refund.

  • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I thought it was just collecting and selling user data but while I’d bet it’s still happening - wow, this is way craftier.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        And Honey has always worked like this. So PayPal knew exactly what they were buying which explains the price tag. Paypal knew they were going to make their money back and then some.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Was it all that surprising to you though?

      By the time honey hit the scene we had been ten years into “sketchy Browser extension that monitors your browsing habits and injects ads”

      I guess getting flogged by your favorite influencer ads a veneer of legitimacy for a lot of people.

      • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think what was truly surprising is that they were bought for 4 billion.That much money for… basically an out and out scam. Paypal is that sure that it’s:

        1. entirely legal

        2. Will never be stopped

        3. will return on a 4 billion investment.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Rakuten is up front about it. They force their affiliate links, then pay you part of their cut.

          Honey forces their affiliate links in exchange for maybe finding you a discount code.

          • gt5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I also think Rakuten compensates me fairly. I take the payout in Amex points. Instead of money they give me 1 cent per point which I can leverage to a value of around 5 cpp through transfers

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I never trust browser extensions outside of a select few. However, I have used Paypal quite a bit. I would think many of us have.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So glad that eBay (as greedy as they are) started handling transactions instead of everyone using PayPal.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        In certain countries they fall under quasi-bank regulations eg. “PayPal Australia Pty Ltd (PayPal) is a limited Authorised Deposit-Taking Institution (ADI) with authority to provide purchased payment facilities (PPFs).”

        That gives some measure of protection on how they handle your funds, but holy shit I would not keep any money in a PayPal account for any longer than absolutely necessary. I use it as a convenient intermediary between my actual card and sellers, no more than that.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, it’s wild how close PayPal came to killing Minecraft early on by locking all of Notch’s money as soon as MC started to take off.