Doesn’t even know the presidential oath he pledged.
You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?
A lot of Trumpers here decorate their cars with “We the people…” in Constitution-style script. I wonder how much of it he needs to violate for them to see the disconnect.
Take their guns away and let’s see what the bobble heads do.
I’d more believe he said he doesn’t know because he doesn’t know what it is but has been briefed about it. Instead of some tongue-in-cheek admission to further fascism. If he didn’t know and hadn’t been briefed I think he would’ve lied that he’s the expert on the Constitution.
Still shouldn’t be president tho.
I’m sure the Oath Keepers group will speak out and act on this. Right? Right? *crickets*
Imagine celebrating a fascist swearing allegiance to a slavemasters pact.
Those people only understand the 2nd amendment, and think the first amendment should only apply to themselves.
At least he didn’t lie…?
He did at the inauguration.
If this comment doesn’t make the case for impeachment idk what does
Upholding the constitution is the most basic part of the job.
If he “doesn’t know” if he can do that he is unfit for the position and should be removed immediately. Not even counting all the other violations of the constitution his administration has committed in just the first 100 days alone
You swear on it when you take the Oath Of Office.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."However,
The Constitution provides no standards for determining whether a President has violated their oath. The fact that other branches interpret the Constitution, and may do do inconsistently with the President, creates difficulties in determining whether the oath has been violated. Just as some Presidents have suggested that the oath may require them to disregard laws when doing so is necessary to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, some lawmakers have argued that the President’s oath requires them to execute all laws, regardless of whether the President believes them to be constitutional. The Supreme Court has not addressed these competing views, and the oath and its surrounding text do not suggest that questions about violations of the oath were intended for judicial resolution. The Court has held that the President is generally immune from civil or criminal liability for official actions taken while in office, which may impede judicial resolution of questions relating to a President’s violation of their oath arising during the President’s tenure. The Constitution’s justiciability requirements are another potential obstacle to resolution in federal court. Impeachment provides a vehicle by which Congress may adjudicate a President’s alleged violation of their oath. Articles of impeachment against Andrew Johnson charged the President with being unmindful of the high duties of his office and of his oath of office. Draft articles of impeachment to be used against President Richard Nixon alleged that President Nixon violated his oath, though he resigned before these articles were adopted. Articles of impeachment adopted in the impeachment of President Bill Clinton charged the President with violating his constitutional oath, as did articles of impeachment adopted in both impeachments of President Donald Trump. The political process provides another check on the President’s violation of their oath. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton suggested in various contexts that political accountability might help ensure the President’s fidelity to their office. In his second inaugural speech, George Washington observed that violating his oath would invite the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C8-1-5/ALDE_00013936/
“to the best of my ability”
Should you wonder how the SC will argue when they need to rule on trump regarding anything done unconstitutional, here’s their out and logic they will use. They will determine that trump acted “to the best of
myhis ability”Can’t wait for the mental gymnastics required from the complicit press to accept that we shouldn’t expect too much from ‘the best of his abilities’, while simultaneously accepting he’s that an infallible king who’s word is law.
he means he doesn’t know the definition of constitution
Traitor cunt.
he cant swear the truth, because he wants to violate it.
WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN’T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN’T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT’S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON’T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!
I dont even trust the voting system. There has been many attempt at manipulating the results. Maybe America didnt allow this.
Doesnt matter though. This guy is awful and dangerous as president.
You shouldn’t, they stole the election, here are the receipts.
https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/
I’m pretty sure this is a bot account
Thank you for saying this for me.
A mob-led “American Constitutionalist Revolution of 2025” has a nice ring to it
THERE IS NO ADULT WAITING IN THE WINGS TO SWOOP IN AND SAVE YOUR NATION! BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE! THE REASON NO ONE IS STOPPING THIS IS EVERYONE IS BUSY ASKING “WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED!”!
Someone did try to stop it but he missed.
What are you doing then? I see a lot of people chastising others for not doing anything while also not doing anything
I think the fact he said ‘your nation’ instead of ‘our nation’ should answer your question
When you say “Allowed” there is no one above him to stop him at this point besides the other branches of government.
Yes, I’m asking why the other branches of government are allowing this
He is performing plausible deniability. Without saying directly yes or no, he is still open to the idea of not upholding the constitution. It is like saying “I can neither confirm nor deny.”
Thing is, HE SHOULD FUCKING KNOW!
But he vowed to uphold the constitution, it’s a requirement of being sworn in as president
Sounds like yet another high crime and misdemeanor. Why doesn’t the co-equal branch established in Article I do it’s duty? And failing that, why doesn’t Hegseth, who has “We the People” tattooed on his drunken forearm, have the courage that he demands of others to tell off his boss? Where are the Oath Keepers who say they are so opposed to a tyrannical government and take their oaths to the Constitution seriously?
They wipe their collective asses with the Constitution. For that, everyone in this administration, and those who enabled it should burn as the traitors that they are.
He does not. He’s above any and all laws. I don’t know why, but he his. The Constitution is meaningless to a king.
That’s because he can’t spell it without looking at his phone
