• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What? Who tf expected that!? They bought Oculus, enshittification happened, and their products are worse now.

    • Pixel@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i hate facebook as much as the next person but the products definitely aren’t worse, I just figure that iteration on VR tech is really hard. The quest 2 and quest 3 are, genuinely, kind of incredible devices from a technological perspective, they’re just hamstrung by faceook. that’s bad but I don’t think it’s fair to say the products are specifically worse when oculus was acquired so early on

      • Eggyhead@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Facebook is the only reason I don’t already have one or two of these headsets right now.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “enshittification” is an enshittification of the english language

      • Eggyhead@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        English teacher here. Languages change over time and there’s nothing you can do about it.

        Feel free to speak with old english if thou very regard it matters. :)

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          i know that, im not a child.
          i’m talking about a particularly stupid word, not the evolution of language.
          also, i don’t believe enshittjfication will stand the test of time, you jive turkey.

          • Eggyhead@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            i don’t believe enshittjfication will stand the test of time

            I actually hope you’re right, because I believe it will only linger as long as there’s behavior taking place that it clearly defines.

            you jive turkey.

            I love this. I wish it was my account name.

              • Eggyhead@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s just a wish. It’s a funny term and I like it, but not worth the effort of making a new account and subbing to all the same groups again. I’ve done it thrice already and it’s a pain in the ass. Maybe I’ll use it next time I sign up for something though.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, we’re a society. Things happen outside of grammar and word rules handed down to us from above…

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          lol, no rules… it’s just a stupid word that sounds stupid and makes anyone who uses it look stupid…
          Shakespeare invented tons of words, and they were all great, inventing new words is great. enshittification, in particular, is just lazy and dumb
          p.s. love it when people do dumb shit and then defend the general category of what they’re doing as if that was the problem

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough but what word do you use instead of enshittification? It filled a gap in the language.

            • xor@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              depends on the context:
              “exploitation”
              “make it shitty”
              ruined
              “fucked it up”
              if it was used way less, in non-pseudo-intellectual contexts, i wouldn’t care…
              there is a term for companies buying companies and lowering the quality of the product while capitalizing on the brand reputation… i forget it though…

              i mean, i barely care but people keep commenting on this so i feel like replying.

              parentification is another one like that. just verbifying the noun and sticking “ification” on the end to have more syllables.

              you could just write out, “children being forced into parenting roles” or something…
              In large families, the eldest child has traditionally taken on more parent-like responsibilities… it’s not new and if it really needs it’s own word, it deserves a more thought out word structure than just:
              “+ification and now let’s try to spread the word and get people to take me seriously!”

              • livus@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Before I reply I just wanna say I’m not trying to fight or argue I’m just quite interested in language.

                All your context-dependent examples are verbs, whereas “enshitification” is a noun - a state of being. That’s why it fills a gap in English.

                Otherwise you need an entire sentence to describe that process A happened to B thing and the result is C state.

                It doesn’t seem intellectual at all to me, I mean it has the word shit in it and its closest contender for meaning is probably “fuckedupness”.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s main problem is that people overuse it massively and act like they’re saying something really clever by using it

            • xor@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              🛎️ 🔔 🔔
              yep. it’s like pseudo-intellectuals got too lazy to learn big words and use them incorrectly, so they just added syllables to “shitty”

          • AngryMob@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What you describe as the word’s flaws make it perfect though. The word itself is an icon for the actions it describes

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why, in objective terms, is it lazy and dumb? Or do you just not like it?

            Plenty of useful and appropriate words are used by people in dumb ways, that does not make the words themselves dumb.

                • xor@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “i feel personally injured by someone else not liking something that i like, so i will harass and berate them for saying so”

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had so many VR fanboys going on and on about how it’ll change the world, and I’ve always told them they were wrong because of the cost and tech limitations like battery life. Also the fact that people will think it looks stupid - even something as comparatively minimal as Google Glass was ridiculed, hated, and flopped.

    Looks like I was right. Again.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      tbf, google glass and similar are AR rather than VR. Honestly the technology has been improving over the last few years, though not in as dramatic a fashion as when it went from a rare lab or obscure tech hobbyist thing to something mainstream consumers could buy, if expensively, more in the same sense that things like computer gpus get a little bit more powerful each generation but stay fundamentally being the same kind of thing. The cost has also gone down a bit on the low end (though the higher end is still thousands, its possible to get a decent headset for the mid hundreds, or low hundreds if you get a refurbished or lightly used one). I dont think it will really revolutionize all that much, but I do think it will gradually become a reasonably significant area of the entertainment market, in the same way that things like video game consoles arent revolutionary technology beyond a certain segment of the entertainment market, but are still common enough to be economically and culturally relevant. With the current prices and use case, video game consoles are essentially what they are. Im personally exited to see where the tech goes, even though it probably wont be the next smartphone the way some claim.

    • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like glass was accidentally very beneficial for the industry.

      It both drastically increased the general public’s consciousness and awareness of the industry around AR/VR and then set the bar so low as to be trivial to exceed. People who mocked it know that bad AR with privacy concerns is not good, but when they try acceptable VR they are blown away by it.

      It’s mostly just the lack of the “killer app” equivalent that is holding us back.

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since when have any of these tech companies done anything but change the world for the worse?

    • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know we are on lemmy so corporations are bad and capitalism is bad and so on and so forth…

      But there is not one aspect of my life that hasn’t been improved upon greatly by one or more tech companies over the course of my life.

      There are new problems that I never would have expected to deal with that have come up as a side effect of this improvement, but it’s way too reductive to imply that tech companies haven’t changed the world for the better as well.

      • Conyak@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a net sum to me. The harm they have done to our society and planet far outweigh and good that has come with it. Technology isn’t inherently evil but these tech companies that only care about profit at all cost are.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Despite the Facebook hate the Quest really did revolutionize VR. It made entry level VR at a great price with no hassle. The Quest was $500 and worked without needing beacons and a headset tethered to a gaming PC.

    VR went from a few million users before Quest to tens of millions after.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This can’t be overstated. VR is one hell of an investment, and there’s not really any way to figure out if it’s something that works for you in advance. I enjoy it for the discounted price I got a Quest 2 at last holiday season, but I would have been disappointed if I had paid a higher price.

    • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      VR went from a few million users before Quest to tens of millions purchasers after.
      No one uses these things

      FIFY

    • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All my friends that got into VR all said the same thing when I asked them why they don’t play it more- it’s all packed away and setting everything up again is more of a hassle than it’s worth. The Quest really just made things dead simple- no wire, no lighthouses, use anywhere there’s a little bit of space.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Inside-out standalone HMDs were getting developed with or without Facebook. AMD’s “Sulon Q” was previewed in early 2016.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i felt the same way but i was gifted one recently… it’s still pretty awesome, and it runs android so you can put it in developer mode and sideload whatever you want…

      i expected it to be locked down like apple, but no it’s pretty sick.

      see also: original NES Legend of Zelda ported to oculus…

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          not really their blessing, but yeah you have to create a developer account, agree to be part of a human centipede, and then you’re in…

          there’s even an alternative side loading store call side quest that streamlines it and has a ton of stuff to download…

      • Russ@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in a similar boat, however I was very disappointed to see that in order to enable developer mode you have to make/sign in with a Meta account and “register” as a developer with them.

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          i didn’t like that either… but it was quick and free…
          had to take a shower afterwards though…

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I at least was able to recoup a few bucks when they forced fb accounts. A friend was interested in buying a headset anyway so we worked out a price for my account and just migrated it to his fb instead of mine. Bought an index and it’s pretty tight.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, they have changed the world, they have ruined the perfectly good term metaverse with their failed product.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Despite their company name, they have nothing actually called metaverse. Their entry in the metaverse category is called horizons.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also ruined Oculus by not supporting my Rift S anymore, and forcing everyone to move over to Meta accounts.

      I literally will never purchase an Oculus again. I owned a DK1 and a DK2, then skipped the CV1 for the Rift S. I am done with Oculus now, maybe I will look at HTC or some other HMD instead if I ever need to replace my Rift S.

      • neocamel@lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, so the original Rift is useless? Like, I can finally toss it out and stop trying to sell it to someone?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but I don’t think that this is really Facebook so much as VR in general.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much. I’d never buy anything Facebook related but it’s more that the tech just is not quite there yet. This fact not just causes some big caveats, but also drives the price up. Even the Oculus ones, which are considered entry level, are still fairly expensive kits. It’s a big investment, and the actual support is still fairly limited.

      There’s some great tech & prototypes out there that are really interesting though. From very high-tech enthusiast gear to very small and lightweight solutions. I’m sure we’ll eventually see a bigger market push for VR at some point that makes it more mainstream.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anything that pushes the price down, anything that pushes the weight down, anything that pushes the size down, anything that improves the quality, ways to mitigate motion sickness, better inside out tracking so you don’t have to rely on external stations, etc. etc.

          • exocrinous@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Quest 1 doesn’t need external stations, and it’s so old Meta considers it obsolete and no longer sells software for it. Now granted, that’s not very old, but what I’m saying is the technology is well and truly there. When I use my quest 1 for long enough that the battery runs out, the only ill effects I get are the same I’d get from standing for that same duration of time. No neck pain at all. And I don’t think motion sickness has a technological solution, I think it has a personal solution. I played video games on the TV until I got sick a dozen times when I was small. Now I don’t get motion sick from anything. Video games engage your brain differently, they just do, and your brain has to adapt just like with any hobby. If you play a sport, the exercise will hurt at first. Your body will adapt. If you don’t want to rewire your brain to be able to deal with the sensations of multiple realities at once, then video games just are not for you. Because that’s what video games are.

            I agree, the price was a bit high when I got my Quest 1, but that was years ago and I have never felt the need to upgrade. It’s a perfectly fine device that can do everything I want. I suspect that in 2024, you can buy an old headset on the cheap. I actually had a friend who was giving away a quest for free last year and was looking for someone to take it.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I said better inside out tracking. Most enthusiasts still swear by the Index because of this. Also, the Quest 1 is like looking through a cutout with that POV. And no, there’s several techniques already used to reduce / mitigate motion sickness, with more being used as we move further to understand the underlying issue of it.

              • exocrinous@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fundamentally motion sickness comes from the instinctive expectation that reality exists and follows certain patterns, and I consider this an immoral belief. The process of adapting to motion sickness requires internalizing on some level a tiny part of the idea that our experience of reality is mutable, so I think we should never use motion sickness mitigating technologies except the kind that help people make this realisation.

                • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s the dumbest shit I’ve heard all day. I have better things to do than talk about esoteric bullshit.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And that was 100% of the changes that were expected, not sure what this article is going on about.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, I was about to but an Oculus Rift years ago, but once they were bought out by Facebook, I swore them off forever.

      I’m still waiting for a decent, privacy respecting headset that’s not too expensive and works well on Linux.

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was going to buy one, but when they got bought out it made the Vive an obvious choice for me. No regrets, it still works great.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I got a cv1 before Facebook bought them. It’s been downhill from there. Not to mention the lack of linux support which forced me to keep a windows partition just for it.

          It’s in storage now, I don’t know if I’ll be able to reinstall it when I put my machine back together in a few months.

          All in all it’s was a fine piece of kit killed by, I’m not even sure, greed probably.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard good things, but they seem to be discontinued at this point and I’m worried about parts availability and whatnot if something breaks.

          I’m casually looking at Valve Index. It seems Valve is looking into a successor, so I might wait a bit to see what that looks like. I’m in no hurry.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can get 2/3 with the Valve Index, but I don’t think you’ll ever get all 3.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is there a valve index 2 on the way?

          I would hate to finally get it only for the 2nd version to release a year or two after.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’ve been debating getting one, but it’s a bit expensive for how much I’d actually use it (like once/month or so). I’m happy to throw $500 at a toy, but not $1k+.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Facebook (or Meta) sends me threatening emails every week about my Oculus account being deleted if I don’t bow down to Zuckerberg and link my Facebook account to it.

        I havent touched either in years.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        vr glasses also have controller buttons dont they. If the implied activity would give men carpal tunnel though I think we would all be miserable by now

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They do; but you’re not crunching down the carpal tunnel with how they’re used. Your wrist is unimpeded and doesn’t have to be straight forward in front of you at all times, like a keyboard and mouse at a desk. Controllers themselves don’t cause carpal tunnel; it’s how you hold and move your wrists around. In fact, controllers can help alleviate carpal tunnel because you can use them in a variety of comfortable ways. You also don’t need them at all with some HMDs. The Vision Pro is all hand control, no buttons.

          The motion sickness thing is totally real though. I’ve used VR for two years and I still sometimes have to stop and dry heave.

  • Aztechnology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember when I first heard about Oculus on I think kickstarter… I thought it was cool.

    Then I heard Facebook was buying it and I just wrote it off and knew I’d never have interest in it again. Bought by the wrong type of company

  • They made VR headsets more people can afford that also don’t suck major balls like the PSVR or Google Cardboard (the other affordable VR options). People just don’t want them because they’re Facebook/Meta. 😔

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still can’t believe Tech companies don’t realise: If you want the widest adoption, make something as open source, customisable, editable, codable, and anonymous as you can.

      If you don’t want something to be wide spread, demand everyone’s data, make it a black box you can’t edit, customise, or be creative on, and you have to link to all your other profiles.

      Meta would have been best off had logins been entirely optional, and they’re still trying to life that bad reputation three generations later.

      That said the quest is a great product, and I use mine every day to stay fit.

      • I’m not even sure just how closed off a system it even is. Most of the things I run on it were installed through ADB from GitHub and not any official sources. I have access to the root system files. What’s stopping someone who knows what they’re doing from making a custom OS for 'em so you don’t need to associate with Meta once you have the hardware in your hands?

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The moment they made you use Facebook to sign in was the moment I decided I’ll never buy one of those.

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just set up a Quest Pro and couldn’t get past the setup without Meta account

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Meta account yes, facebook account no. The meta account is just a renamed oculus account. Has your games and stuff on it, but not tied to anything else.

          • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s still data I’m providing to Zuckerberg, and I’m seemingly getting friend requests on it?

          • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the company meta is just the renamed company Facebook. So you still give Facebook/Meta your data. Who knows what they will do with it

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doubtful, while facebook does have a huge segment of the VR market, they’re not the only relevant player, so dont have the ability to entirely control it, and while I’ll certainly not be buying any headset of theirs given their extreme lack of trustworthiness even for a tech company, they have played a pretty big role in improving the tech and bringing the costs down a bit. I think some people just expected the tech to go from “blurry 3-d monitor strapped to your face” to “indistinguishable from reality the way its shown in fiction” in short order and have taken the gradual refinement of the tech instead of rapid leap as a sign that the technology has failed or something.

      • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the acquisition did change VR from being a pretty open standard to being a walled garden where Facebook is paying devs to make their games not work with any other headset. I think without exclusivity there would be more interest in PCVR as a whole.