The full speech livestream is here

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So his whole pitch is “If you elect Trump democracy will end. If you elect me it won’t.” While this is a good argument this isn’t going to get people to the polls. They need something to vote for, not something to vote against.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather hear what he’s going to do and how he’s going to do it than be told shit we already know.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look to the Democratic Party platform if you want to know what he’ll aspire to. What he can actually do will be constrained by the Congress we elect and by the courts

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hasn’t been restrained by Congress when he bypasses it to fund a genocide but for anything else suddenly he has zero power

        • aew360@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah because Republicans wanted that. Do you not understand civics? They don’t want anything else that actually helps America

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The President has a bunch of explicit power around military decisions.

          That’s not the same as being able to just go do anything.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He’s correct about Trump, but why do I doubt that this will make a lick of difference to the people who were going to vote Trump? Unfortunately him saying that will probably only confirm to the Trumpists that Trump is the scrappy underdog hero they already think he is.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The goal is not to convince Trump’s core supporters, but to get low-information voters to understand what the choice they’re making actually is.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The people that sue to keep people off ballots, RCV off ballots, rig their own primaries, and cancel primaries to install their chosen candidate have no business talking about threats to democracy

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are different levels to being a threat to democracy. I’m pretty sure what Democrats did doesn’t really compare with the dictatorship Trump has in mind and what happened on Jan 6.

    • ax_xa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People that sue to keep insurrectionists off the ballot are fine by me.

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The DNC has sued to keep Green party off state ballots, they argued in court they are a private corporation that can use primaries to install their preferred candidate, and theyve sued to keep RCV off ballots for future elections, and sued to keep RCV off ballots where its already passed for use.

            Trump, who you are referring to, even though he is a piece of shit, has only keep accused of insurrection, not charged with it. Whether you like it or not, until he’s charged, he should be free to stay on the ballots. Which is what I expect SCOTUS to rule.