There has to be some Luigi’s Mansion-subreddit they could jump over to?

That’s like ~1650 years ago. When’s the next opening?

I have a th*ory that censoring certain w*rds makes the t*xt read more edgy and illegal, drawing in even more p**ple for the clickbait.

I’m new to this. Does “shitpost” have to be litteral?

For me, the problem is different 🤔 I work in an environment with young people 👶 Young people who speak with emojis 💯 and they expect others to speak with emojis as well 🤝 So when I write a message or a mail 📩 Then I need to figure out which emoji I need to replace the periods with 😅 And the minefield is kinda terrible, since some of the “regular” emojis are considered highly passive agressive 🙂

Would be fun if they streamed Civilization.

Year 12, month 30, day of month 2023. What’s unclear?

Not if you count Taylor Swift

Unfortunately, yes.

I’m also bothered by very detailed QR codes. Milk cartons in my country had a QR-code for their website. It would be a ~10 letter url, maybe with a short path. But for some reason, the QR code was extremely detailed, as if it contained several kilobytes of data. I’m not sure if there were a large number of tracking-related parameters in the url, but it was very obviously unreasonably large.

My VW Passat hybrid has carried more material on the roof rack than I’d be happy to admit.

All of their thumbnails are unfortunately click-baity. They spoke about ut in an older video. Apparently, the click-baity images drive too much traffic for them to justify something more subtle.

I’m wondering what we’ll see first. Him passing of old age or him facing any consequence for his illegal actions.

I’m afraid to ask, but what is the current number?

I just don’t get why Disney would go to that extent when the lawsuit should have easily been disregarded as not applicable to them. Digging up an old Disney+ membership to find some terms which could apply seems like a terrible PR move for their service.

Calling out bullshit before the bullshitter performs the bullshit might help people see the patterns of Trumps behaviour.

I really don’t have a clue, but calculating averages might yield results which don’t represent a directly applicable value. If some people lose tens of years due to dramatic complications, it could weigh up a lot for people who barely lose any life length.

Again, I’m just guessing wildly, but anything which scares people away from smoking is good in my opinion.

It’s a very rough approximation which was used in anti-smoking campaigns, at least in the 90s/00s.

When you want to create the atmosphere of the 60s without having to smoke anything yourself?

One inhalation on a single cigarette is said to reduce your life by 7 minutes. How does this apply here? Is the scale linear or exponential?