• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Oh look, a broken clock.

    How many times do we need to keep this nation “united” at gunpoint before we acknowledge that the science and reason people are incompatible with the supply side Jesus and racial hatred people? We can’t stand one another, and time only deepens that division until bloodshed, over and over.

    You can’t educate those cultures that refuse to be educated or have their children educated. That kind of change, born of desperation and constant struggle inflicted from your own culture’s values needs to come from within. The Red States need their Martin Luther “maybe we shouldn’t punch ourselves in the face every day” reformation moment, and it isn’t rational for those that see beyond their ignorance and superstition be dragged down with them for generations until they get there. Blue states propping them up only prolong comfort in their ignorance.

    You can’t force cultural evolution or save the willfully ignorant from their own willlfull ignorance from outside on Alabama anymore than you can on Afghanistan, all you do is create a common enemy for them, as we continue to experience.

    • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have held this stance for many years (am not American though), and everytime I proposed it someone from the US told me “Nooo we’ve had that in the past and we fought a civil war in order to stay together!!! We can’t split!” and I think it’s like a broken marriage that was never easy to begin with that’s just being held together because the parties are too stubborn to say “ok well let’s split up”. It’s an unhealthy relationship.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Canada has given the world some of the worst extremists, racists, etc. (Proud Boys being one of the more recent horrible things we’ve exported)

    There’s a group that popped up during the convoy called diagolon. They posted this way back which seems like how things would work (a path from Russia to Florida)

    They claim it’s a joke, but isn’t it always just a joke.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    About the only thing that would make me happier than to have the entire pacific west coast secede and create a sovereign nation would be for Trump to do it for us so we don’t have to fight a war over it. You want us gone? Please, show us the exit, we’ll be on our way. No takebacksies.

  • M600@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      A known traitor threat against the United States was allowed to run for and be elected president. This country doesn’t have laws except for the poor and it certainly doesn’t have a functioning system of justice or even government at this point.

    • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Depends.

      Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve always loved this quote about conservatism:

          Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

          • Francis M. Wilhoit
        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You"re correct. I was wrong. The Constitution would have to be amended to allow for it first.

          The United States Constitution does not explicitly provide a method for the dissolution of the union. In fact, the Constitution is quite silent on the topic of secession or dissolution.

          However, there are a few relevant provisions and historical precedents that are often cited in discussions about the possibility of dissolution:

          Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1: This clause, also known as the “Guarantee Clause,” states that the United States shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government. Some argue that this clause implies a constitutional obligation for the federal government to maintain the union and prevent secession.

          The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2): This clause establishes the Constitution and federal laws as the supreme law of the land, which some interpret as precluding the possibility of secession.

          The Civil War and the 14th Amendment: The American Civil War (1861-1865) was fought, in part, over the issue of secession. The 14th Amendment (1868) was ratified in the aftermath of the war and includes language that could be seen as prohibiting secession. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States shall be eligible to hold federal or state office.

          Texas v. White (1869): In this landmark Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that secession is not permissible under the Constitution. The decision stated that the Constitution looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible states.

          While these provisions and precedents suggest that the Constitution does not provide a clear method for dissolution, they do not necessarily rule out the possibility of secession or dissolution entirely. Some argue that secession could be achieved through a constitutional amendment or a negotiated agreement between the federal government and a state or group of states.

          It’s worth noting that, in practice, the possibility of dissolution is often seen as a highly unlikely and potentially destabilizing event. The United States has a long history of federalism and a strong tradition of national unity, which has generally been maintained through a system of shared power and compromise between the federal government and the states.

        • Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          These people are very much against a lot of things on the constitution…and the bible…and fake-champion both…ugh

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So they know that Texas doesn’t have a GDP high enough to even run all their red catastrophies, right? I’m kidding, I know they don’t know. They probably also don’t know that CA would be the third largest super power if they ever let us go. Which they won’t. At all.

    • Restaldt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      California should secede and kick off the great (terrible) balkanization of the formerly united states

      NCR & The North East republic

      Vs

      Yeehawistan

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unfortunately that would cause a Pakistan-Bangladesh situation with a country connected by airlines. Except worse because Illinois, Minnesota, Colorado, and New Mexico would be enclaves in trumpistan

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know, they are certainly close to dumb enough to sign off on it. Or, you know, we can just do it and ignore the rules since they are all so fond of that now.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Californians are in an abusive relationship. Blamed for everything and not allowed to leave

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, divorce yourself from all those states that send you money because you’re too backward to care for yourself. Sounds like a great idea!